Published in: Irish Educational Studies
Abstract:
Work experience is regarded as a vital component of Transition Year (TY) by students, parents, and teachers. Despite this centrality, the manner in which placements are organised has evolved in an ad hoc manner, and limited attention has been paid to the perspectives of hosting organisations. This study explores the experiences and views of 11 providers of TY placements. Situating TY work experience within its historical and policy context and drawing on research on work-based learning and career development, the paper examines providers’ motivations, expectations, and challenges. While organisations expressed strong commitment to supporting young people’s early engagement with the world of work, the findings reveal significant ambiguities concerning the educational purpose of placements and the nature of school-employer relationships. The study argues that stronger structures, clearer shared understandings, and more systematic engagement between schools and providers are needed for the full potential of TY work experience to be realised.
Clerkin, A., & Jeffers, G. (2026). Learning from employers’ perspectives on transition year work experience. Irish Educational Studies, 1–31.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2026.2675305
Published in: Wellbeing and Schooling. Transdisciplinary Perspectives in Educational Research
Abstract:
This chapter describes two programmes, with significant similarities and differences, that have been available in Ireland since 1974 (Transition Year; TY) and South Korea since 2013 (Free Year Programme ; FYP ). TY takes place over one full year as an integrated part of mainstream secondary education. TY students engage in developmental activities, vocational work experience, and increased interaction with the adult world. These experiences are intended to facilitate enhanced maturity and broadened horizons, supporting young people in becoming fulfilled citizens. Although TY is well-established within Ireland, it is an unusual innovation internationally. However, 2013 saw the introduction of FYP , which was partially informed by TY. South Korean policy-makers recognised concern about student wellbeing and stress in a high-stakes academic environment , and challenges relating to students’ readiness for the working world. FYP is a response to those concerns. This chapter offers an overview and comparisons between the two programmes. We argue that both are founded on a eudaimonic view of wellbeing in education, aiming for more holistic and rounded student development. Significantly, both programmes emphasise community engagement and interpersonal development, alongside personal development and self-directed learning. The challenges and practices identified offer lessons for educators in Ireland, South Korea, and other jurisdictions.
Clerkin, A., Jeffers, G. & Choi, S.D. (2022). Wellbeing in personal development: Lessons from national school-based programmes in Ireland and South Korea. In: McLellan, R., Faucher, C. & Simovska, V. (eds) Wellbeing and Schooling. Transdisciplinary Perspectives in Educational Research. Vol. 4 (pp.155-172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95205-1_10
